本文印刷
全画面プリント
代数幾何学セミナー
過去の記録 ～03/19｜次回の予定｜今後の予定 03/20～
| 開催情報 | 金曜日 13:30～15:00 数理科学研究科棟(駒場) ハイブリッド開催/117号室 |
|---|---|
| 担当者 | 權業 善範、中村 勇哉、田中 公 |
2019年10月30日(水)
15:30-17:00 数理科学研究科棟(駒場) 122号室
Andrew Macpherson 氏 (IPMU)
A Tannakian perspective on rigid analytic geometry (English)
Andrew Macpherson 氏 (IPMU)
A Tannakian perspective on rigid analytic geometry (English)
[ 講演概要 ]
Raynaud's conception of analytic geometry contends that the category of analytic spaces over a non-Archimedean field is a (suitably "geometric") localisation of the category of formal schemes over the ring of integers at a class of modifications "along the central fibre". Unfortunately, as with all existing presentations of non-Archimedean geometry, this viewpoint is confounded by a proliferation of technical difficulties if one does not impose absolute finiteness conditions on the formal schemes under consideration.
I will argue that by combining Raynaud's idea with a Tannakian perspective which prioritises the module category, we can obtain a reasonable framework for rigid analytic geometry with no absolute finiteness hypotheses whatsoever, but which has descent for finitely presented modules.
Raynaud's conception of analytic geometry contends that the category of analytic spaces over a non-Archimedean field is a (suitably "geometric") localisation of the category of formal schemes over the ring of integers at a class of modifications "along the central fibre". Unfortunately, as with all existing presentations of non-Archimedean geometry, this viewpoint is confounded by a proliferation of technical difficulties if one does not impose absolute finiteness conditions on the formal schemes under consideration.
I will argue that by combining Raynaud's idea with a Tannakian perspective which prioritises the module category, we can obtain a reasonable framework for rigid analytic geometry with no absolute finiteness hypotheses whatsoever, but which has descent for finitely presented modules.
