本文印刷
全画面プリント
Lie群論・表現論セミナー
過去の記録 ～04/19｜次回の予定｜今後の予定 04/20～
| 開催情報 | 火曜日 16:30～18:00 数理科学研究科棟(駒場) 126号室 |
|---|---|
| 担当者 | 小林俊行 |
| セミナーURL | https://www.ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~toshi/seminar/ut-seminar.html |
2018年12月03日(月)
17:00-18:00 数理科学研究科棟(駒場) 126号室
Ali Baklouti 氏 (Sfax 大学)
Monomial representations of discrete type and differential operators. (English)
Ali Baklouti 氏 (Sfax 大学)
Monomial representations of discrete type and differential operators. (English)
[ 講演概要 ]
Let $G$ be an exponential solvable Lie group and $\tau$ a monomial representation of $G$, an induced representation from a connected closed subgroup of $G$ of a unitary character. It is well known that $\tau$ disintegrates into irreducible factors and the multiplicities of each isotypic component are explicitly determined. In the case where $G$ is nilpotent, these multiplicities are either finite or infinite almost everywhere, with respect to the disintegration's measure. We associate to $\tau$ an algebra of differential operators and it is shown that in the nilpotent case, the commutativity of this algebra is equivalent to the finiteness of the multiplicities of $\tau$. In the exponential case, we define the notion of monomial representation of discrete type. In this case, we show that such an equivalence does not hold and this answers a question posed by M. Duflo. This is a joint work with H. Fujiwara and J. Ludwig.
Let $G$ be an exponential solvable Lie group and $\tau$ a monomial representation of $G$, an induced representation from a connected closed subgroup of $G$ of a unitary character. It is well known that $\tau$ disintegrates into irreducible factors and the multiplicities of each isotypic component are explicitly determined. In the case where $G$ is nilpotent, these multiplicities are either finite or infinite almost everywhere, with respect to the disintegration's measure. We associate to $\tau$ an algebra of differential operators and it is shown that in the nilpotent case, the commutativity of this algebra is equivalent to the finiteness of the multiplicities of $\tau$. In the exponential case, we define the notion of monomial representation of discrete type. In this case, we show that such an equivalence does not hold and this answers a question posed by M. Duflo. This is a joint work with H. Fujiwara and J. Ludwig.
